A few months ago, I wrote a piece about domes and mentioned Brunelleschi's Dome as one example. At the time, I had been reading Ross King's book by the same title as this entry. But the book left me wanting a cleared picture of how the dome was built. What was clear was how he didn't build it: with centering scaffolding. The space enclosed by the dome was just too big to use wooden supports (as was conventionally done to build smaller arches and domes).
This remained something of an abstract curiosity for me until a few weeks ago when I was back in Florence. Once again, I was confronted...overwhelmed really...by the shear size of this magnificent structure. Most everyone has seen pictures of the Duomo but until you are in it's presence you don't have a good idea of the scale of this structure. And it was all built without a scaffold.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/303c6/303c6fdaae577fcf9c08f3b8c4a10ef5b3722698" alt=""
Frankly, I like the idea that the best minds today with all of the tools at their disposal cannot figure out how a goldsmith in 1420 built the dome without leaving any plans or instructions for future generations to ponder. We have a tendency to think of anyone in the past as "disadvantaged" and perhaps a little less capable than we are ourselves. Brunelleschi punctures that balloon and leaves us feeling a little more humble. I also like the fact that Brunelleschi did not feel the need to leave any plans or writings about what he did. To him, the Dome itself was all the record that was needed. When I stand in the square looking at his accomplishment, I have to agree.
2 comments:
Ricci's theory was the most convincing to me in 1995 when I wrote my Master's on the topic. have you heard of anything recently?
Regards,
Jim Bredeck
Jim, Thanks for your comment. I did a quick search and saw that the National Geographic Channel had a broadcast a program featuring Ricci's theory. You can see the trailer here:
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/videos/player.html?channel=1806&category=5569&title=7116
Was your thesis on the method of construction or some other aspect of the work?
Post a Comment